Thursday, April 22, 2010

Has the Restore America Plan brought the Republics back?

I have been tracking and researching the "Guardians of the Free Republics" and the "Restore America Plan"
It appears the Guardians of the Free Republics are not full of hot air.
The GOFR had stated that the US Supreme Court was "on board" and assisting in bringing back our constitutional law and the Republics.

Several "news items" have hit the "legal community websites" today.

The US Supreme Court just decided an issue concerning FORECLOSURES....against the bank and for the natural person:

http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2010/04/supreme-court-rules-legal-error-no.php

The US Supreme Court just hear oral arguments concerning "mistakenly having the wrong party named in a lawsuit against a corportation"...If the decide "correctly"...the corporate government, banks, etc...will all be re-hauled into court and dismantled.

http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2010/04/supreme-court-hears-arguments-on_21.php

And also...from MONTANA...eliminating the "unauthorized practice of law". This is a "law" that has been used so you are I cannot go into court and speak on behalf of another natural person. In the information from the GOFR, one of the demands was that a natural person has the right to choose whomever they wanted to speak on his/her behalf.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2010/04/montana-unauthorized-practice-commission-dissolved.html

Let us hope and pray that the restoration is completed.

Nancy

6 comments:

Digitalnomad said...

"sovereign citizen" is an oxymoron. You are either a sovereign or a citizen. There is no such thing as a a sovereign citizen.

judgeAmerica said...

Ditto "Digitalnomad" thank you that was needed.

Also, I note that Nancy has provided links to the Supreme Court cases - thank you as well.

And now to quote your own words "again" - "this "Restore America Plan" is legitimate, WE will have a LOT of work to do getting the people up to speed on HOW to (finally) live as the free people of the Republic."

Nancy

>>>>>

My question to you is - Who is going to bring you and the other knuckleheads involved or hanging-on to the RAP/TRAP, up to speed, as to reality?

Since you conduct yourself as a dumbed-down product of the mind conditioning of the World, when using acronyms "instead" of spelling the words out - as a sovereign "Must" do?


By: David Clarence: Expressly Reserving All Liberties.

Nancy Lazaryan said...

David,
Again, you cannot read.

On a different blog I posted:

IF this "Restore America Plan" is legitimate, WE will have a LOT of work to do getting the people up to speed on HOW to (finally) live as the free people of the Republic.

here is the link to the comment:
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2010/04/restore-america-plan-is-it-real.html

David and Digitalnomad,
If you would like to debate the concept of the sovereign, the citizen and the Sovereign Citizen, I will create another blog post.

Did you notice Citizen is with a capital "C"?

Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act said...

"...a Sovereign is not a 'person.'" United Mine Workers vs. United States, 330 U.S. 258.

"The State Citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent contract." Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393.

"If the Christian name be wholly mistaken, this is regularly fatal to all legal instruments..." A New Abridgement of the Law, Matthew Bacon, Vol.
III (1846).

"Conviction of a nonexistent crime results in a void judgment not subject to waiver." People v. McCarty 94 Ill. 2d 28, 37 (1983).

"A judgment obtained without jurisdiction over the defendant is void." Overby v. Overby, 457 S.W.2d 851 (Tenn. 1970).

"The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived." Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect. 163

"The right of the citizen to travel upon the highway and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, differs radically and obviously from that of one who makes the highway his place of business for private gain in the running of a stagecoach or omnibus." State vs. City of Spokane, 186 P. 864
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491
"The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486, 489

"Governments are corporations. Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons." penhallow v. Doane 3 U. S. 54; 1 L. Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54. 36)
Want more? I've got one for every issue. If you think A Sovereign is a person (corporation), you're a big dummy that even the Supreme COurt disagrees with. You know more than the Supreme Court about law please sign and return within 10 days if you have an oath and I will give you $500 like I'll give any law enforcement here who does! Piss off haters! You are the dummies!

Bryan said...

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."

According to my Webster's New World Dictionary, Second College Edition, a sovereign is one who is:

"1. above or superior to all others; chief; greatest; supreme 2. supreme in power, rank, or authority 3. of or holding the position of ruler; royal; reigning...."

According to my Webster's New World Dictionary, Second College Edition, a sovereign is one who is:

"1. above or superior to all others; chief; greatest; supreme 2. supreme in power, rank, or authority 3. of or holding the position of ruler; royal; reigning...."

This is how we ARE unique as citizens of America....regardless of what anyone (I mean ANYONE) else say's - PERIOD.

Our Constitution was constructed this way purposely by our Founding Fathers.

Bryan said...
This comment has been removed by the author.