What was served upon the Governors?

I just made this request to my Governor's office to view the papers that the "Guardians of the Free Republics" served on my Governor.

We will see what happens.

Data Practices Request

Thursday, May 6, 2010 10:18 AM

From:

"Nancy Lazaryan" View contact details

To:

paula.brown@state.mn.us

Ms. Brown, It is my understanding that you are the Responsible Authority under MN Chap.13 for data requests for the office of the Governor. Please verify this with the published document required of the Governor's office to specify the Responsible Authority and proper designees under MN Chap 13. If you are the Responsible Authority, then I am making this demand for data: To view the any and all papers that were served upon the office of the Minnesota Governor on or about March 30, 2010 to April 1, 2010. Including but not limited to papers that were from an organization known as "Guardians of the Free Republics" Although I am not required under the law to explain WHY I would like to view these papers, I will communicate these point to you: 1. The Governor sits in an office created by the People. 2. Communications to that office are PUBLIC. 3. National media confirmed the delivery of the papers from the "Guardians of the Free Republics". 4. Official report from the FBI was that said papers did not contain threats of violence. 5. As it has already been reported by the FBI that there were no threats of violence, there is no basis to claim the papers cannot be released as a matter of public safety (or national security). 6. I have been informed by a staff member at the Governor' office that the papers were turned over to the FBI. Please answer these questions: A. As this was a matter of the Governor of the STATE being given papers, under what authority of law does the FBI, a federal agency, now investigate? B. Organizations serve papers on the Governor all the time. Is it a policy of the Governor to give all papers that are served upon the office of the Governor to the FBI? C. If the answer to the above question is no, then why were the papers from the "Guardians of the Free Republics" given to the FBI? D. If the answer to the above question is yes, under what authority of law does the Governor of the state of Minnesota involve a federal agency (ie. FBI) in matters concerning the citizens of the state petitioning the office of the Governor? E. I am a member of the media. My sources have told me the papers contained a "gag order". If this is correct, under what authority of law was the "gag order" issued? Thank you for your attention to this matter. Nancy Lazaryan

Conflict over the Restore America Plan

Just about one month ago major news media ran a story about 50 governors getting letters from a group called the Guardians of the Free Republics. Interesting, I thought. Groups send letters to governors all the time, and the major media never covers the event.

So I did some digging. Researching, and talking to those involved in "the plan".

Much of the information about our country being run by a corporate government, and not the "people's" (de jure) government I found fascinating. And if true, we have been used as human chattel, slaves. It also made sense why the government was acting unlawfully...not complying with the restraints of our constitutions.

What troubled me was the secrecy. Not of the secrecy of a Grand Jury investigation, but the secrecy of WHAT "the plan" actually is.

Shortly after it was announced by Sam Kennedy and Tim Turner that "the Republic has been restored", I and others awaited "announcements" and "proofs" that there was some truth behind our Republic being restored.

On Sunday, May 2, 2010 Sam Kennedy, on this radio program "Take No Prisoners" asserted scathing charges against other "Elders".

Frankly, I am frustrated. With the hours of digging and gleaning through information, I have been repeatedly told that "the people" would "revolt and riot" if they knew the truth of what has been done to them.

I strongly disagree.

And though there may have been "good intentions" behind the Restore America Plan, denying people the truth is denying us the choice.

Until the "Elders" and those "behind the Elders", and these "trustees" that are supposedly controlling "our accounts" TELL US WHAT IS HAPPENING, I am troubled that we are being used a pawns.

What is law? What is freedom?

In my hunting around attempting to educate myself I came upon some information:

The United States Isn't a Country
— It's a Corporation!

Link: http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm

The same website has a more recent article (Feb 2010):

Historical background — the Establishment of Capitalist Supremacy

Link: http://www.serendipity.li/capitalism/prognosis_2012.htm

These articles are well written and not full of the "emotional screaming" found all over the web.

Let us say, for the sake of discussion, that the information contained in these articles is correct.

What are the solutions we can work towards?

Many will say, "Humble yourself and pray."

And, "Jesus is Lord."

Which then raises the issue of religion being used, hand in hand, to politically manage the population.

I have read the Dead Sea Scrolls, as well as the "original" documents written by "major religions". It is fascinating how ALL of these documents speak of the individual's relationship with the "Sovereign" Creator, warning of any intrusion by "man" into that relationship.

And it is interesting how ALL of these teachings have morphed into "man controlled religions", and ALL of the original documents have been altered by man, including the "Holy Bible".

One theme that is taught throughout these "original" documents is that of a struggle for the "minds of men", a struggle against a system devised to keep the people blind.

Another theme is "You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free." .....What is "Truth"? ......What is "free"?

The above linked articles are interesting, as they speak to the mechanics of a system that has been devised to keep us blind.

If we agree that there is a "Sovereign Creator", then we must also agree that the universe, Earth and all of us were created with an INTENT.

This mechanism of global domination of the people is old news, having been repeated over and over.

Why?

Why would the Creator set in place what could potentially destroy this entire planet?

Some of the most thought provoking documents I read include the "Gospel of the Holy Twelve" and the "Gospel of Peace to the Essenes". Reference is made in those documents of Yeshua at the "Last Supper" discussing the "transmutation" of the human form. The "crucifixion" was to demonstrate this transmutation, and Yeshua illustrated transmutation by describing how bread and wine transmutates into flesh and blood.

In these and other ancient documents is reported that Yeshua, as well as many, many others "transmutated".

Yeshua also warned, "Beware of others that come after me that will say I am God, I am but the son of man."

We can look at the mechanics of the system that is currently consuming the energies of the people.

We can say how horrible this is.

We can "pray", but do we even know "who" we are "praying to"?

History is now repeating itself.

Once again, the masses are poised to be completely consumed by an elite few.

Religion has taught us to "forgive" and to "pray".

Unless we step back and objectively evaluate the "creation" and not just the mechanics of "what is happening" we are doomed to repeat the past.

Consider the "Strawman" argument. We know about the "government" attempting to turn us into artificial entities so that they can lay claim upon our energy.

Yet, at birth, by virtue of being given a NAME, you were claimed by "the system".

WHO are you?

I am commonly known as Nancy Lazaryan.

But that is NOT whom I am.

We are told about being placed upon this Earth as "stewards".

We are told there is "good and evil".

We are told we are to "battle against evil".

Yeshua spoke about the fallacies of "scriptures", directing people to study the creation so that they would understand the Creator.

This Earth, this creation has nothing to do with "good and evil".

The actions of men need to be defined as "lawful and unlawful".

What is lawful? What is unlawful?

IMO

Lawful is that which preserves the creation (stewardship).

Unlawful is that which destroy the creation (shown by consumption based upon greed)

The "Golden Rule" is found throughout the original ancient religious documents. Basically:

Honor and acknowledgment of a Creator of the universe.

Sagacious communication (reasoning with that Creator).

Sagacious communication with each other.

IMO once we UNDERSTAND and OPERATE lawfully, we will bring in what Christians describe as the "Kingdom of Heaven".

It is from this perspective, my paradigm that I evaluate the Restore America Plan and the Guardians of the Free Republics.

RAP is presented to the masses as a mechanism to expose and "correct" the "system of man". The people are thirsty for "freedom".

However, are the people prepared to act LAWFULLY.

Thomas Jefferson was criticized for being a slave owner. In one of his letters which I read, he admits to slavery being wrong, but that the slaves needed to be educated in HOW to be a citizen, before they became citizens. Jefferson educated all of "his slaves".

IMO this country was established upon the principles of the TRUE original "Christian" church, the Essenes (who were called "Yahoos" for the first three hundred years "A.D.") It was a beginning point, a proclamation. However we failed to complete the work.

We have all been slaves, especially since the Civil War and the 14th Amendment.

We do not know WHO WE ARE.

And because we get caught into the "sound bites" and manipulated by emotions...we are blind.

Unless we CHOOSE to take the veils from our own eyes and CHOOSE to become WHO WE ARE....

History will repeat itself.

Guardians of the Free Republics, Restore America Plan Update

For those of you that have seen my videos online and have followed my work, you know I am a research nut.

Prior to the "delivery to the governors" the "letters" from the Guardians of the Free Republics (on or about April 1, 2010) I was aware of the "Restore America Plan". Someone had sent me a link to their website, which I reviewed.

Frankly, I thought it to be just another bunch of "patriots" with lots of paper trying to stop the criminals in "our" government. All the "secrecy" annoyed me. After the mainline media reported on the Guardians of the Free Republics, I thought, "How strange, mainline media never reports on these kinds of things."

So I had to step outside of "my box" and evaluate what was happening in relationship to the things I know, or at least the things I think I know.

I have done EXTENSIVE research in particular matters that involve "our" government and the Grand Jury.

I also have been doing additional researching of the Guardians of the Free Republics (GOFR) and the Restore America Plan (RAP).

From this perspective, I make this observation:

1. The United States Supreme Court (USSC) was/is involved with RAP.

2. The military is involved with RAP (proven my the Provost Marshals that served the papers upon the governors of the 50 states).

3. Large organizations flood the government with "petitions for redress", "Articles of Freedom", etc...many demanding a public official "step down" and that never hits "mainstream media". The fact that some pieces of paper given to the governors by RAP hit the major media is telling, in and of itself.

4. The USSC cannot "see or hear" someone just coming and complaining to them. There is a process necessary for a lawful petition. (I believe this lawful petition was accomplished. I also believe at least one Justice of the USSC helped in drafting the petition...that is my GUT feeling.)

5. The executive branch has the authority to gather a Grand Jury "open venure"...go out and get people for the Grand Jury, when the (court) system is corrupt and not allowing people to bring evidence of corruption before the Grand Jury. (Wild v. Otis is an interesting case to read as to the right to access the Grand Jury)

6. Grand Jury investigations are REQUIRED BY LAW to be secret.

7. The RAP Grand Juries HAVE BEEN "rounded up by the executive branch and seated". This is lawful and has happened.

8. The "documents to the governors" were necessary to re-establish the DE JURE (for the people) government. Once this was accomplished, the executive branch (military) had jurisdiction to "round up" those qualified to sit on the de jure Grand Juries.

9. The reason we are "hearing nothing" and "everything is secret" is because Grand Jury investigations are required BY LAW to be secret.

10. Once indictments come down from the Grand Juries, THEN the USSC can "hear and see" the people.

11. I am a subscriber to "Jurist Newsletter". This newsletter covers what is happening around the world in the different courts. Earlier this week the USSC made two important decisions that indicate the USSC is no longer "under the corporate government". Then on Thursday and Friday, there was NOTHING reported ... no decisions in the US Court of Appeals or the USSC. This is very odd.

12. The Grand Jury can, by law, appoint its OWN prosecutor.

13. When the people learn the truth, as how we have been used as collateral for the elite to amass nearly all the wealth of this country (and the world) there is a real potential of riots.

14. IMO it is because of this potential of violence that the FBI released the story of the letters to mainstream media. And look at the comment by the FBI (paraphrased) "GOFR are not violent, but it is feared someone else may be violent."

15. The "bad guys" have the weapons to destroy this entire world. Getting to and securing those weapons is a primary concern to ensure the Republics are free.

16. The pop guns used by citizen militias are no match to the weapons "they" have that can and have been used against us. I was a TV reporter at the 2008 RNC and personally know what it is like to be attacked by our "government forces".

17. If RAP fails, we do NOT have the means to defend ourselves against the advanced weapons controlled by "our" government.

18. If RAP fails, it will be "emergency time" for the scientists to put their heads together and figure out some way to defend against the advanced weapons.

I understand the need for secrecy, as I understand the law that governs the Grand Jury.

My HOPE is the indictments that will be brought by the De Jure Grand Juries will be enforced by the executive (military) and the judiciary.

My HOPE is that the (now free) Republics are "backed by gold"...remember what happened in the Revolutionary War?

My HOPE is that the scientists will not need to be called upon, as our last defense.

Nancy Lazaryan

P.S. In my own experiences and with others, I have found "our" government has no fear of the people that created the government. The constitutions that the people created and that are supposed to be used to restrain "our" government are repeatedly and routinely ignored by those "in office". Everyday people are so involved with just making ends meet, they cannot see how we have all become slaves. Everyday people FEAR the government, a government that no longer serves the people. WHY IS THAT? Maybe, just maybe, the Guardians of the Free Republics and the Restore America Plan are correct.

Has the Restore America Plan brought the Republics back?

I have been tracking and researching the "Guardians of the Free Republics" and the "Restore America Plan" It appears the Guardians of the Free Republics are not full of hot air. The GOFR had stated that the US Supreme Court was "on board" and assisting in bringing back our constitutional law and the Republics. Several "news items" have hit the "legal community websites" today. The US Supreme Court just decided an issue concerning FORECLOSURES....against the bank and for the natural person: http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2010/04/supreme-court-rules-legal-error-no.php The US Supreme Court just hear oral arguments concerning "mistakenly having the wrong party named in a lawsuit against a corportation"...If the decide "correctly"...the corporate government, banks, etc...will all be re-hauled into court and dismantled. http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2010/04/supreme-court-hears-arguments-on_21.php And also...from MONTANA...eliminating the "unauthorized practice of law". This is a "law" that has been used so you are I cannot go into court and speak on behalf of another natural person. In the information from the GOFR, one of the demands was that a natural person has the right to choose whomever they wanted to speak on his/her behalf. http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2010/04/montana-unauthorized-practice-commission-dissolved.html Let us hope and pray that the restoration is completed. Nancy